<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title><![CDATA[Imagine Sonoma County]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://imaginesonomacounty.com]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[Comments]]></description>
<generator>Commentics</generator>
<item>
<title>Jenny Blaker</title>
<link><![CDATA[http://imaginesonomacounty.com/vision/comments/buildings1.php?cmtx_perm=172#cmtx_perm_172]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>100% renewable needs to mean solar + storage, wind + storage, and geothermal I think. It should never include forest woody biomass, as wood converted to electricity is not clean (highly toxic), not carbon neutral (produces more carbon emissions than coal) and not renewable (mature trees are the best way to sequester carbon; it takes decades for large trees to be replaced, if at all, and we haven&#39;t got decades!) So we need to push for honest carbon accounting. See <a href="https://www.biologicaldiversity.org/campaigns/debunking_the_biomass_myth/pdfs/Forest-Bioenergy-Briefing-Book-March-2021.pdf" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">https://www.biologicaldiversity.org/campaigns/debunking_the_biomass_myth/pdfs/Forest-Bioenergy-Briefing-Book-March-2021.pdf</a></p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2021 17:28:11 -0700</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">item_172</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Emerald</title>
<link><![CDATA[http://imaginesonomacounty.com/vision/comments/buildings1.php?cmtx_perm=125#cmtx_perm_125]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>No to all forms of centralized power, including Evergreen. </p><p>Yes, to community-based power that is self-sufficient.</p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2021 07:15:18 -0700</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">item_125</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>